You are not logged in.

#1 21-03-2019 11:50:23

Admin & Trader
From: Paris - France
Registered: 21-12-2009
Posts: 2630

Will ASIC follow ESMA's leverage restrictions?

Will ASIC follow ESMA's leverage restrictions?

With tightening regulations in Europe and Asia, Australia is still considered a safe haven - but will this continue?

Over the past year, waves of regulations have made certain regions appear less appealing to retail traders, with Europe being a clear example of this. However, as is usually observed, Europe’s pain seems to be Australia’s gain.

As you may be aware, the European and Securities and Markets Authority (ESMA) implemented leverage limits and marketing restrictions for a number of financial instruments in the retail trading space.

These restrictions were implemented for 4 months, however, already the regulator has renewed the prohibitions a number of times, and may continue to do so indefinitely until they are made permanent.

These restrictions have taken a toll on brokers in the industry. It’s now more expensive and much more restrictive for financial institutions to operate in this space and European and United Kingdom financial licences are starting to look less and less appealing.

Amid stricter regulations, Australia is increasingly perceived as being a safe haven

One country which appears to be the ultimate benefactor of this situation is Australia. The territory has the benefit of being a developed country and therefore, has a developed trading market, however, it lacks the highly-restrictive regulation found in Europe.

The nation's local regulator, the Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC), has been ramping up its efforts to create a fair and honest market for retail traders, however, as of yet, it has not put in place leverage caps for contracts-for-difference (CFD), foreign exchange (forex) and cryptocurrencies, as well as marketing restrictions for CFDs and binaries.

As a result, the market has started to view Australia as a safe haven in terms of regulation. However, with rumours surfacing that ASIC might start to go down the route of ESMA and impose leverage restrictions – could Australia’s status as a safe haven almost be over?

Paul Derham a Partner at Holley Nethercote Commercial & Financial Services Lawyers, opines: “I think Australia is a fairly coveted jurisdiction. I think that the ASIC is very much aware of that and is applying strict questioning to new entrants, who are applying for licenses.

Asking things like ‘are you going to be targeting European traders directly?’ They’re directly asking questions like that. So there is an overall goal at an international level to reduce regulatory arbitrage.

Anthony Griffin, an OANDA Australia executive, says: “Right now, Australia is very much viewed as a safe-haven for brokers, however we believe this will change in the coming years.

“Late last year, the government introduced a Bill into the Australian Federal Parliament that, once passed, will afford ASIC product intervention powers, allowing them to ban high-risk products such as binary options and cap leverage at levels similar to other major jurisdictions.

“However, while few would disagree that this is an important piece of legislation, it will likely take a few months for the bill to pass given the current political climate and the upcoming election in May.

Safe haven or not, Australia still implements strict rules

Although Australia is considered to be a safe haven, that doesn’t mean it’s easy to obtain a licence there. For financial institutions wanting to offer CFD or forex trading, they must first have an Australian Financial Services (AFS) licence.

The process of acquiring one of these is both costly and can take a significant amount of time. As was recently reported, from 2 July 2017 until 29 June 2018 the number of applications for AFS licenses was 1,728. From this number, 758 were approved, which is a 44% success rate.

ASIC application times for AFS licences

Derham also says that to get a licence, brokerages and financial institutions are looking at paying around AU$100,000 (US$70,600). This includes AU$50,000 for the licence application and another AU$50,000 for the legal documentation required.

But this is just for compliance and legal fees and doesn’t take into account the additional costs linked to insurance policies, audits, derivative trade reporting, trading platforms and more. Furthermore, Derham outlines that the biggest fee is the cost of competent, experienced staff on the ground in Australia, with a problem-free track record working for regulated brokers.

Commenting on the current regulatory environment in Australia, Griffin says: “The good news is that we are starting to see greater scrutiny around new licence applications, so while the Australian regulatory landscape still has some way to go when it comes to the OTC derivatives market, it is becoming harder to set up shop in the meantime.

Will the ASIC copy the ESMA’s efforts?

Regarding the rumours that ASIC might be following in the footsteps of ESMA, Derham opines: “I think there is truth in the rumours because ASIC wants to reduce regulatory arbitrage. I think the industry is trying to self-regulate as best it can but whether or not ASIC uses its powers to reduce leverage and impose some of those ESMA-like requirements. No one knows."

Sophie Gerber, Managing Director at Sophie Grace, an Australian compliance and legal consultancy entity serving the financial services industry, and TRAction Fintech, believes that if there are any changes from ASIC, it’s not expected to come soon.

There are a number of reasons we could expect there to be a change at some point in the future, the primary one being that Australia is a member of IOSCO and will be expected to follow their recommendations at some point. However, I would not anticipate that there will be movement on the issue until after the issue has first been finalised by the FCA and/or ESMA,” she says.

The difficulty with introducing more regulation is the need for monitoring and enforcement that comes with it. I think it is important that the current regulations relating to the space are seen and perceived to be enforced well before the introduction of further measures,” she adds.

This topic was debated over at the iFX EXPO in Hong Kong on the Beyond the Basics: Opportunities in APAC panel earlier this year. In this panel, this exact issue was talked about – will the ASIC implement leverage restrictions? The overall opinion was no, at least in the short-term, however, in the long-term things are less clear.

"Anything worth having is worth going for - all the way." - J.R. Ewing



Board footer